Skip to content
← All comparisons

Reachability

Anyport vs Pangolin

Pangolin is not a competitor and this page would be dishonest if it pretended otherwise. It is an identity-based remote access platform built on WireGuard, combining a reverse proxy with VPN capabilities, and it does not build or deploy applications.

If your deployment story is already solved and you only need to reach what you run, Pangolin or Cloudflare Tunnel is the smaller and better answer. Anyport overlaps with it on exactly one function, publishing an application from a network with no inbound route, and differs in that publishing is a side effect of the deployment rather than the product.

01Common ground

What both of them do

This much both products do, so the table below is only about where they differ.

  • Reaching services in a network with no inbound route.
  • HTTPS on your own domain in front of them.
  • No inbound firewall rule on your side.

02The differences

Where they differ

Each row asks one question and sets the two answers across a seam. The highlighted row is the one this comparison turns on.

Pangolin

Remote access over WireGuard

Identity-based, with a reverse proxy in front.

What it is

Anyport

A deployment control plane

It builds, deploys and then publishes.

Pangolin

No

Does it deploy your application

Anyport

Yes

Push to a branch and it builds on your own cluster and rolls out as a numbered revision.

Pangolin

Anything reachable from the connector

Runtime

Anyport

Kubernetes

Anyport can install k3s on a bare machine if you do not have a cluster.

Pangolin

A WireGuard tunnel to a node you run

You put that node somewhere with a public address.

How traffic reaches your network

Anyport

The connection the agent already opened

TLS is not terminated on the way through.

Pangolin

You do, on a VPS

Who runs the public endpoint

Anyport

We do

And only for clusters with no public address of their own.

Pangolin

Over your applications' visitors

Identity-aware access, which Anyport does not do.

Access control

Anyport

Over your team

Roles on the platform, not on who can reach your application.

Pangolin

Open source, plus paid tiers

Community edition, with managed and Enterprise options.

Price

Anyport

$5/mo or $50/yr

Gateway traffic allowance of 10 GB free, 100 GB on Pro, then $0.02 per GB.

Pangolin

See their site

Compliance

Anyport

Not certified yet

Controls are published in full on the security page instead.

03The decision

Which one to choose

Each list is written to be true. If the first one describes you, the better product is theirs.

Choose Pangolin if

  • You already have a way to deploy and only need to reach or publish what is running.
  • You want identity-aware access in front of internal tools, which Anyport does not provide.
  • You want to run the public endpoint yourself on a VPS you control, with no vendor in the path.

Choose Anyport if

  • The deploying is the part you actually want solved, and the publishing is a consequence of it.
  • You would otherwise be assembling a deployment tool and a tunnel and owning the seam between them.
  • You want managed databases, previews, cron tasks, logs and metrics in the same place as the routing.

04In their words

What Pangolin is

Taken from their own documentation and pricing.

Pangolin now describes itself as an open-source SASE platform: identity-based access to web apps, SSH, desktops, private hosts and AI providers under one policy model, set against Cloudflare One and Zscaler, and compared in its own docs to a reverse proxy and a VPN.

It does not build or deploy applications. It provides access to things that are already running.

It can be self-hosted or used as a managed cloud service, with Community and Enterprise editions.

It was the fastest-growing project in this whole comparison when we last measured stars, on 22 August 2026.

05Questions

Questions people ask

Can I use Pangolin with Anyport?

Nothing stops you. They are different layers. If a cluster already publishes through Pangolin or Cloudflare Tunnel, Anyport does not need to be in the traffic path at all: our gateway is used only for clusters with no public address, and a cluster that has one serves its own traffic directly.

How does Anyport publish from a cluster with no public IP?

The agent holds an outbound connection open, and requests for your hostname travel back down it. The gateway reads the server name from the TLS handshake, which the client sends before encryption is negotiated, and forwards the remaining bytes untouched. It terminates no TLS and holds no certificate for your domain.

What does Anyport require of a cluster?

A Kubernetes cluster you can run one command against, or a bare Linux machine where Anyport installs k3s first. No inbound port, no public IP, no load balancer that can obtain one, and no kubeconfig handed to us. The agent opens a connection outward and holds it open. With no cluster at all, Anyport Cloud runs one for you on Pro, billed for what your apps use.

What does Anyport cost?

Three clusters are free with every feature and unlimited members, apps and projects. Pro is $5 a month with $5 of credit back each month; clusters past the free three are $2 a month each, and clusters on Anyport Cloud $5, billed by the hour. Compute on your own clusters is never metered because it is not ours, and the one counted resource there is traffic our gateway carries for clusters with no public address of their own: 10 GB a month free, 100 GB on Pro, then $0.02 per GB. A cluster on Anyport Cloud runs on our hardware instead and is billed for what your apps use, at $12 per vCPU and $6 per GiB of memory a month, from credit.

Is Anyport audited or certified?

Not yet. In place of a report, the security page documents what the agent runs with inside your cluster, what crosses the boundary and how secrets are stored, so a reviewer can evaluate the controls directly. Two of them hold regardless of certification: we never receive credentials for your Kubernetes API, and your workloads keep serving whether or not our control plane is reachable.